Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 27383

AbstractConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Reviews
Year : 2023 | Month : September | Volume : 17 | Issue : 9 | Page : NE01 - NE05 Full Version

Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency: A Review Focusing on Staging, Diagnostic and Treatment Modalities


Published: September 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/62898.18498
Archana Ramkrishna Thool, Vaibhavi Wasnik

1. Associate Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, DMIHER, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Medical Student, Department of Ophthalmology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, DMIHER, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Archana Ramkrishna Thool,
Associate Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, DMIHER, Sawangi, Meghe, Wardha-442001, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: drarchana8030@gmail.com

Abstract

The cornea being a transparent tissue acts as a refractive surface as well as a protective barrier of the eye. The corneal epithelium is being continuously replaced and renewed by the Limbal Stem Cells (LSC). The turnover of corneal epithelium is brought about by asymmetrical differentiation and self-renewal of LSCs, their migration to the cornea and desquamation of current corneal epithelium. LSC are undifferentiated cells that acts as progenitors of corneal epithelium and maintains corneal homeostasis. LSC resides in its own microenvironment known as LSC niche, which are capable of sustaining these tissue regenerating cells. Any intrinsic factors (e.g., toxic epidermal necrolysis or mucous membrane pemphigoid), extrinsic factors (e.g., thermal burns, radiations, chemical burns) or genetic defects (e.g., aniridia) cause impairment of LSC or its niche leading to Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency (LSCD). LSCD is associated with invasion of cornea by conjunctival epithelium, corneal opacity, and visual impairment. The diagnostic modality of LSCD includes fluorescein staining and slit lamp examination, impression cytology, confocal scanning and anterior chamber optical coherence tomography. The staging of LSCD is important for deciding the treatment modalities. In LSCD, the most common treatment modality includes LSC transplant from a healthy eye. Non LSC transplantation techniques are being used to prevent allograft rejection. In this review article, the authors aim to summarise the existing knowledge of the aetiology, staging and treatment modalities of LSCD.

Keywords

Conjunctival limbal autograft, Cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplant, Limbal stem cell niche, Non limbal epithelial cell transplant

Cornea is the anteriormost part of the eye, which acts as a refractive surface and forms a protective barrier from the outside environment. The conjunctival epithelium, covering the sclera, is contiguous with the corneal epithelium. At the junction of the corneal and conjunctival epithelium lies the limbus (Table/Fig 1). The LSC are present at the basal limbal epithelium surrounded by a specialised microenvironment called the LSC niche. These LSC niche are found in limbal crypts between stromal projections such as palisade of Vogt (1),(2).

The corneal epithelium because of its barrier function and maintenance of its transparency has to renewed by LSCs asymmetric division, migration and proliferation. The LCS is thus responsible for maintaining the corneal homeostasis, which can be explained by the X-Y-Z hypothesis of corneal regeneration represented in the (Table/Fig 2). According to Thoft RA and Friend J the X represents the asymmetric differentiation of LSC into Transient Amplifying Cells (TAC) and stem like daughter cell. The Y represents the centripetal migration of TAC and proliferation into fully differentiated corneal epithelial cells. The Z in the X-Y-Z hypothesis represents the desquamation of the superficial cell of the cornea (3). The rate of turnover of corneal epithelium increases in case of corneal wound or diseases (4).

Deficiency or dysfunction of LSCs or their niche can lead to a pathological condition called LSC Deficiency (LSCD). LSCD is characterised by corneal neovascularisation, delayed or absent healing, and corneal scarring. The limbus is the barrier between the conjunctival and corneal epithelium, hence loss or dysfunction of LSCs or their niche can lead to invasion of corneal epithelium by conjunctival epithelium known as conjunctivalisation (5),(6). LSCD can be bilateral, however, unilateral LSCD is usually more common. There are different aetiologies for unilateral and bilateral LSCD, which will be discussed further. The most common cause of both bilateral and unilateral LSCD is burn injury of the eye (5). The management of LSCD can be done by LSC transplantation. However, there are certain limitations, such as lack of donors of limbal tissue. It therefore becomes really important for development of novel therapeutic strategies (7).

Definition of Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency

An ocular surface disorder caused due to loss in either number or function of LSCs is known as LSCD. There is loss of corneal homeostasis, leading to clinical features of LSCD (6). According to Deng SX et al., there will be invasion by conjunctival epithelium of the cornea, termed as conjunctivisation along with corneal neovascularisation (8). The clinical features will include corneal epithelial erosions, recurrent inflammation, corneal scarring and opacification, recurrent corneal ulcers, chronic pain, and partial or complete visual impairment (5). It is believed that pterygium is secondary to partial LSCD, however, it can occur without LSC dysfunction (9).

Aetiology of Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency

Most of the research regarding LSCD was focused on the therapeutic approaches. However, in 2018, a 10-year-old descriptive study was published by Vazirani J et al., to focus on the demography and the underlying causes of LSCD. The outcomes of the study depicted that unilateral LSCD occurred more commonly than bilateral. The most common cause of both, however were ocular surface burns, lime being the most common agent responsible (10). The aetiological factors of unilateral and bilateral LSCD are summarised in (Table/Fig 3).

Aetiological classification can also be based on whether the cause is either acquired or genetic. Genetic or congenital causes of LSCD include aniridia, Ectrodactyly-Ectodermal dysplasia-Clefting (EEC) syndrome, Peter’s anomaly, Keratitis-Ichthyosis-Deafness (KID) syndrome and xeroderma pigmentosa. Acquired aetiology can be (I) immune related like Stevens-Johnson syndrome, mucous membrane pemphigoid and atopic keratoconjunctivitis (II) non-immune related like trauma, bullous keratopathy, severe infections or iatrogenic (5),(10). The aetiological classification is demonstrated in (Table/Fig 4).

Diagnostic Modalities of Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency

Signs and Symptoms

In the early stages, the patient may not show any symptoms. Patients with symptoms usually present with pain, ocular discomfort, photophobia, blepharospasm, impaired vision or blindness. There will be chronic pain due to recurrent inflammation. There may be history of recurrent atopic or allergic conjunctivitis. Sometimes non healing of corneal erosions even after therapy can indicate towards the of diagnosis of LSCD (8).

The cornea will become translucent, hazy and scarring might be present. The corneal epithelium is thick and uniform and will become thinner and irregular in LSCD. There may or may not be neovascularisation along with conjunctival epithelial invasion of cornea (5). The diagnosis is greatly helped by fluorescein staining examined by slit lamp under cobalt blue light, which will show whorled pattern. Since conjunctival epithelium lacks tight junctions, there may be stippling or granular appearance (8). There will be epithelial irregularities and fluorescein stain will be pooled in areas with thinning of epithelium. There may be a difference in staining patterns in different stages of LSCD. There are few limitations like non-specific patterns of fluorescein staining or very indistinct changes of corneal epithelium. Cytological studies further help in confirmatory diagnosis of LSCD (11).

Impression Cytology

It is a non invasive cell collecting method where cells are collected from the superficial layers of the epithelium. Impression cytology is used to depict conjunctivalisation of cornea. The conjunctival epithelium consists of goblet cells, which are absent in corneal epithelium. In histopathology, the cells collected from impression cytology, are stained using periodic acid Schiff, Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining or Giemsa shows presence of goblet cells, indicative of LSCD (8),(12). Immunohistochemistry detects markers like cytokeratin, which are intracellular proteins present in the epithelial cells. Cytokeratin 7, 13 and 19 are specific for conjunctival epithelium. Cytokeratin 12 is specific for corneal epithelium. Cytokeratin 3 is present in both corneal and conjunctival epithelium (12),(13). The marker for goblet cells is MUC5AC, however due to less number of goblet cells, absence of this marker does not rule out of LSCD (14). It is considered as the gold standard method for the diagnosis of LSCD (8).

In-vivo Confocal Scanning Microscopy

It is a non invasive method of microscopy for visualising significant changes in the microstructure of corneal and limbal epithelium. It examines the presence of goblet cells, the basal epithelial thickness, the sub-basal nerve plexus and the density of cells in the basal epithelium. There will be significant decrease in thickness in the basal epithelium and sub-basal plexus of nerves or there will be absence of palisades of Vogt. In vivo confocal microscopy also helps in staging of LSCD (5),(13).

Anterior Chamber Optical Coherence Tomography (AC-OCT)

It is a non invasive imaging technique of the anterior chamber. In LSCD, there will be thinning of limbal and corneal epithelium, which can be observed by the AC-OCT. There will be 20-30% of thinning in the epithelium. The thinning of the limbal epithelium is attributed to the loss of palisades of Vogt, which can be visualised by AC-OCT. Severity of the disease can be determined by the AC-OCT scans. Hyper-reflectivity of the corneal epithelium along with decreased light penetration depicts conjunctivalisation [8,12]. The AC-OCT scans also help determine the epithelial and stromal reflectivity. The ration of both (ES ratio) >1.29 points towards a diagnosis of LSCD (15).

Optical Coherence Tomography- Angiography (OCT-A)

It is a non invasive imaging modality for the microvasculature of the eye. The changes in limbal vascularisation as well as neovascularisation of the cornea can be determined by OCT-A. An increase in severity of LSCD is characterised by increased density of limbal vascularisation as well as corneal neovascularisation. The most significant characteristic of OCT-A is its ability to differentiate between true LSCD and its similar conditions showing corneal vascularisation. On segmentation of the superficial layers, the vascular density does not show a lot of change. However, in non-LSCD cases because of deep vascularisation, there will be significant decrease in the limbal vascular density on segmentation of superficial layers. The limitation of OCT-A is that it cannot be used in grading the severity of the disease (12),(15).

Staging of Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency

An objective grading system was evolved by international consensus. Accordingly, there are three stages based on the corneal and limbal involvement, which increases in severity. In stage I, the central cornea, that is the central 5mm of the cornea are not involved. The limbal involvement in this can be subdivided into (A) where there is <50% limbal involvement, (B) where there is >50% but <100% limbal involvement and (C) where there is 100% limbal involvement. Stage II, the central 5 mm of the cornea is affected. It can again be subdivided based on the limbal involvement into (A) where there is <50% limbal involvement and (B) where there is >50% but <100% limbal involvement. The third stage, stage III, involves the entire cornea (5),(8).

Another more precise grading system was developed by Aravena C et al., allotting scores based on limbal involvement, corneal involvement and visual axis involvement (16). The limbal scoring is depicted in (Table/Fig 5).

The corneal surface is divided into four regions by drawing three parallel lines, perpendicular to the axis of greatest corneal involvement.

Involvement of each region was awarded one point. If the visual axis, that is the central 4 mm of the cornea, was involved, 2 points were assigned. If there was no visual axis involvement, no points were allotted [8,16]. Accordingly, the total score was obtained by adding all the scores of these three parameters, the lowest score being 2 and the highest being 10. LSCD was divided into mild, moderate and severe based on this clinical grading depicted in (Table/Fig 6),(Table/Fig 7).

Medical Mana gement of Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency

Medical management is indicated in limbal distress and early stages of LSCD. Limbal distress is when there is not a clear dysfunction or deficiency of LSCs, rather distress of LSCs where they are unable to proliferate due to an acute injury (17). The main aim of the therapy is to basically control the aetiological factors, optimisation of ocular surface and further stop the progress of the disease. The autoimmune diseases and inflammation of the ocular surface should be managed (5). In contact lens wearers, the conservative management was to suspend the use of contact lens. Other methods included excessive use of artificial tear drops, maintaining lid hygiene (18). LSCD and contact lens use is associated with tear film dysfunction. Tear film plays a major role in maintaining the proper functioning of the corneal epithelium. Dry eye is often associated with LSCD and hence its management plays an important role in conservative treatment. Artificial tear use, warm compresses, doxycycline as well as supplementation with omega-3 fatty acids shows significant improvement in dry eye symptoms [19,20]. To combat chronic inflammation, which is a clinical feature of LSCD, short-term corticosteroids can be administered, like prednisolone or methylprednisolone. Corticosteroids also help in regression of conjunctival haze from the cornea. Vitamin A ointment is also considered to be effective (18). Scleral lens, called Prosthetic Replacement of the Ocular Surface Ecosystem (PROSE), have been found to be effective when used before surgical management in improving visual acuity and optimising ocular surface (21).

Surgical Management of Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency

After optimisation of the ocular surface by medical management, surgical as well as cell based therapeutic management is done depending upon the staging and the laterality of the disease [5,22]. Stages I and IIA are medically managed along with sequential sectorial conjunctival epitheliectomy along with amniotic membrane transplantation and pannus removal in progressive cases (22),(23). In stages IIB and III with unilateral involvement, autologous LSC transplantation is the treatment of choice. In bilateral involvement of stages IIB and III, allogenic LSC transplantation, keratoprosthesis and Cultivated Oral Mucosal Epithelial Transplantation (COMET) can be done (22).

Limbal Epithelial Cell Transplants

Conjunctival Limbal Autograft (CLAU)

CLAU is used in unilateral LSCD. It is the removal and transfer of two grafts of the limbal tissue from the healthy eye of the patient. There is a risk of iatrogenic LSCD in the donor eye due to excessive removal of LSCs (24),(25). In the donor eye, 3-4mm from the limbus, an incision is given on the conjunctiva, followed by peritomy in 6 clock hours parallel to the limbus. The conjunctival flap is reflected 1mm beyond the vascular arcades and then excised. The graft is then sutured to the recipient eye in its appropriate anatomical position (26). A study conducted by Eslani M et al., investigated long term results of CLAU involving 27 subjects, demonstrated ocular surface stability in 77.8% of the subjects (27).

Living-related Conjunctival Limbal Allograft (lr-CLAL)

In patients with bilateral LSCD, conjunctival limbal allograft is harvested from the living relatives of the patients. This is beneficial in having greater chance of HLA compatibility and reduces the risk of graft rejection. The patient still needs to be on immunosuppressive drugs (28). Under local anaesthesia, the dissection of the donor eye spans from 3mm outside the limbus and 1mm into the limbus. Usually, two tissues are harvested superiorly and inferiorly in 3 clock hours. The harvested limbal tissue is then sutured into its suitable anatomical position in the recipient eye along with the conjunctival tissue and amniotic membrane (29).

Keratolimbal Allograft (KLAL)

It is usually preferred in cases of bilateral LSCD due to contact lens or Stevens-Johnson syndrome, because of their lack of conjunctival involvement. Here, cadaveric limbal tissue are harvested along with cornea as a carrier (30). In the donor eye, the central cornea is separated from corneoscleral rim using corneal trephine and the peripheral corneo-limbal tissue is dissected without much stromal involvement. In the recipient, the graft should cover 360 degrees, one end succeeding the other. Amniotic membrane is used to cover cornea and adjoining conjunctiva and the grafts are placed over them in their appropriate anatomical position. The disadvantage of KLAL is the long-term immunosuppressive therapy and increased risk of graft rejection (26),(29).

Cultivated Limbal Epithelial Transplantation (CLET)

It was first demonstrated by Pellegrini G et al., for the management of unilateral LSCD. It is the cultivation of autologous limbal tissue, harvested by limbal biopsy, on the amniotic membrane with explant tissue culture techniques. The limbal tissue sheets along with amniotic membrane are then transplanted in the diseased eye (31). Autologous CLET shows long-term survival of the graft as well as improvement in vision without any significant complications (32). Confocal microscopy one year after CLET showed, no presence of palisades of Vogt, 31% patients showed mixed type of conjunctival and corneal epithelium whereas, 46% patients showed corneal epithelium in the cornea (33).

Simple Limbal Epithelial Transplant (SLET)

The corneal epithelium affected by LSCD is scraped off, which is known as de-epithelisation or superficial keratectomy. A fresh amniotic membrane is placed on the de-epithelised cornea with the help of fibrin glue, a small limbal graft obtained by limbal biopsy of approximately 1 clock hour or less is taken from the unaffected eye and divided into 4-6 pieces. These divided pieces of limbal graft are then put on the amniotic membrane, leading to the cultivation of limbal tissue in vivo. This technique was discovered by Sangwan V et al., is found to be successful. The long-term outcome by a study by Basu S et al., found that 76% patients showed positive outcome (7),(34),(35).

Non Limbal Epithelial Cell Transplants

Cultivated Oral Mucosal Epithelial Transplant (COMET)

The oral mucosal epithelial cells have been transplanted in bilateral LSCD to prevent allograft rejection. A stratified sheet is formed by cultivated oral mucosal epithelial cells. The cultivated sheets in the basal layers demonstrated proliferation markers like p63 as well as k3 and k19 which are specific for corneal epithelium (36). The COMET have shown 43% to 67% positive results, however, due to the oral mucosa being thicker, the visual outcomes were dissatisfactory (37).

Mesenchymal Stromal Stem Cells (MSC)

These are multipotent stem cells derived from different tissues such as bone marrow, dermis, periosteum, and fat cells. With the transplantation of MSC, there is a likelihood of the redevelopment of LSC niche, which can prolong the therapeutic outcome. These cells are anti-inflammatory in nature and can control angiogenesis, hence, can be potentially used for the LSCD. The lack of clinical date is a hinderance in establishing whether MSCs will fulfil the assumption of showing positive and prolonged therapeutic outcome [38,39].

Recommendation

It is important to educate the patients about the disease and its complications as it can lead to visual impairment and can also lead to blindness if left untreated. This will affect the ability, self-esteem and self-care and often leads to psychological impairment, especially in younger and middle age group. It is also very important to educate about usage of topical drugs as few medications can lead to structural changes of epithelium, tear film dysfunction and dry eye which can lead to LSCD.

Conclusion

The LSC play a significant role in maintaining the vision. Various aetiological factors can lead to the dysfunction or deficiency of these cells. Corneal diseases are more commonly the reason of blindness worldwide, LSCD being one of them. LSCD is loss of corneal homeostasis due to loss or dysfunction of LSC or their niche. LSCD is a fairly new entity and still requires extensive study for proper diagnosis and management. The diagnostic tools for LSCD have been useful for not only diagnosis but also follow-up after treatment. Non invasive imaging techniques have vastly improved the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis and should be used to confirm all cases of LSCD. There are newer treatment modalities, which have significantly reduced the use of allographic transplantation, which is accompanied by severe complications. However, the interactions and signalling pathways between the LSCs and their niche are yet to be fully understood. There is still scope for development of pharmacological advancements when it comes to therapeutic management. Some researchers believe that LSCD can be reversible and manageable by conservative and medical treatments. Understanding the signalling pathways and interactions between LSC and their niche may help us in reversing LSCD.

References

1.
Schermer A, Galvin S, Sun TT. Differentiation-related expression of a major 64K corneal keratin in vivo and in culture suggests limbal location of corneal epithelial stem cells. J Cell Biol. 1986;103(1):49-62. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2424919/ (accessed Dec. 24, 2022). [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Abdul-Al M, Kyeremeh G, Saeinasab M, Keshel S, Sefat F. Stem cell niche microenvironment: Review. Bioengineering. 2021;8(8):108. Doi: 10.3390/bioengineering8080108. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Thoft RA, Friend J. The X, Y, Z hypothesis of corneal epithelial maintenance. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1983;24(10):1442-43. PMID: 6618809.
4.
Chen J, Tseng S. Abnormal corneal epithelial wound healing in partial-thickness removal of limbal epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32(8):2219-33.
5.
Bonnet C, Roberts J, Deng S. Limbal stem cell diseases. Exp Eye Res. 2021;205:108437. Doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2021.108437. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Le Q, Xu J, Deng S. The diagnosis of limbal stem cell deficiency. Ocul Surf. 2018;16(1):58-69. Doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.11.002. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Dong Y, Peng H, Lavker R. Emerging therapeutic strategies for limbal stem cell deficiency. J Ophthalmol. 2018;2018:7894647. Doi: 10.1155/2018/7894647. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Deng SX, Borderie V, Chan CC, Dana R, Figueiredo FC, Gomes JAP, et al. Global consensus on the definition, classification, diagnosis and staging of limbal stem cell deficiency. Cornea. 2019;38(3):364-75. Doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001820. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Medical Advisory Secretariat. Limbal stem cell transplantation: An evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2008;8(7):01-58. PMID: 23074512; PMCID: PMC3377549.
10.
Vazirani J, Nair D, Shanbhag S, Wurity S, Ranjan A, Sangwan V. Limbal stem cell deficiency-demography and underlying causes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;188:99-103. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.01.020. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Mehtani A, Agarwal M, Sharma S, Chaudhary S. Diagnosis of limbal stem cell deficiency based on corneal epithelial thickness measured on anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017;65(11):1120-26. Doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_218_17. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Kate A, Basu S. A review of the diagnosis and treatment of limbal stem cell deficiency. Front Med. 2022;9:836009. Doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.836009. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Barbaro V, Ferrari S, Fasolo A, Pedrotti E, Marchini G, Sbabo A, et al. Evaluation of ocular surface disorders: A new diagnostic tool based on impression cytology and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(7):926-32. Doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.164152. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Rivas L, Oroza M, Perez-Esteban A, Murube-del-Castillo J. Morphological changes in ocular surface in dry eyes and other disorders by impression cytology. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1992;230(4):329-34. Doi: 10.1007/BF00165940. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Varma S, Shanbhag SS, Donthineni PR, Mishra DK, Singh V, Basu S. High-resolution optical coherence tomography angiography characteristics of limbal stem cell deficiency. Diagnostics. 2021;(6):1130. Doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11061130. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Aravena C, Bozkurt K, Chuephanich P, Supiyaphun C, Yu F, Deng SX. Classification of limbal stem cell deficiency using clinical and confocal grading. Cornea. 2019;38(1):01-07. Doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001799. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Ahmad S. Concise review: Limbal stem cell deficiency, dysfunction, and distress. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2012;1(2):110-15. Doi: 10.5966/sctm.2011-0037. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Kim BY, Riaz KM, Bakhtiari P, Chan CC, Welder JD, Holland EJ, et al. Medically reversible limbal stem cell disease: Clinical features and management strategies. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(10):2053-58. Doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.04.025. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Rossen J, Amram A, Milani B, Park D, Harthan J, Joslin C, et al. Contact lens-induced limbal stem cell deficiency. Ocul Surf. 2016;14(4):419-34. Doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2016.06.003. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Bhargava R, Kumar P, Arora Y. Short-term omega 3 fatty acids treatment for dry eye in young and middle-aged visual display terminal users. Eye Contact Lens. 2016;42(4):231-36. Doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000179. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Kim K, Deloss K, Hood C. Prosthetic Replacement of the Ocular Surface Ecosystem (PROSE) for visual rehabilitation in limbal stem cell deficiency. Eye Contact Lens. 2020;46(6):359-63. Doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000685. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Deng SX, Kruse F, Gomes JAP, Chan CC, Daya S, Dana R, et al. Global consensus on the management of limbal stem cell deficiency. Cornea. 2020;39(10):1291-302. Doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002358. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Díaz-Valle D, Santos-Bueso E, Benítez-Del-Castillo JM, Méndez-Fernández R, López-Abad C, Martínez-de-la-Casa JM, et al. Sectorial conjunctival epitheliectomy and amniotic membrane transplantation for partial limbal stem cells deficiency. Arch Soc Espanola Oftalmol. 2007;82(12):769-72. Doi: 10.4321/s0365-66912007001200011. [crossref]
24.
Ang LP, Tanioka H, Kawasaki S, Ang LP, Yamasaki K, Do TP, et al. Cultivated human conjunctival epithelial transplantation for total limbal stem cell deficiency. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(2):758-64. Doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-3379.[crossref][PubMed]
25.
Kenyon K, Tseng S. Limbal autograft transplantation for ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology. 1989;96(5):709-23. Doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(89)32833-8. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Fernandes M, Sangwan VS, Rao SK, Basti S, Sridhar MS, Bansal AK, et al. Limbal stem cell transplantation. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2004;52(1):05-22. PMID: 15132374.
27.
Eslani M, Cheung A, Kurji K, Pierson K, Sarnicola E, Holland E. Long-term outcomes of conjunctival limbal autograft in patients with unilateral total limbal stem cell deficiency. Ocul Surf. 2019;17(4):670-74. Doi: 10.1016/j. jtos.2019.09.003. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Ghahari E, Baradaran-Rafii A, Djalilian AR. Living-related conjunctival-limbal Allograft (lr-CLAL) Transplantation. Ocul Surf Dis Cornea Conjunctiva Tear Film. 2013: 333-39. Doi: 10.1016/B978-1-4557-2876-3.00041-9. [crossref]
29.
Sangwan V, Fernandes M, Bansal A, Vemuganti G, Rao G. Early results of penetrating keratoplasty following limbal stem cell transplantation. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2005;53(1):31-35. Doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.15282. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Cheung A, Holland E. Keratolimbal allograft. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2017;28(4):377- 81. Doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000374. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Pellegrini G, Traverso CE, Franzi AT, Zingirian M, Cancedda R, De Luca M. Long- term restoration of damaged corneal surfaces with autologous cultivated corneal epithelium. Lancet. 1997;349(9057):990-93. Doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)11188-0. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Borderie VM, Ghoubay D, Georgeon C, Borderie M, de Sousa C, Legendre A, et al. Long-term results of cultured limbal stem cell versus limbal tissue transplantation in Stage III limbal deficiency. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2019;8(12):1230-41. Doi: 10.1002/sctm.19-0021. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Pedrotti E, Passilongo M, Fasolo A, Nubile M, Parisi G, Mastropasqua R, et al. In vivo confocal microscopy 1 year after autologous cultured limbal stem cell grafts. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(8):1660-68. Doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.04.004. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Sangwan V, Basu S, MacNeil S, Balasubramanian D. Simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET): A novel surgical technique for the treatment of unilateral limbal stem cell deficiency. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(7):931-34. Doi: 10.1136/ bjophthalmol-2011-301164. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Basu S, Sureka S, Shanbhag S, Kethiri A, Singh V, Sangwan V. Simple limbal epithelial transplantation: Long-term clinical outcomes in 125 cases of unilateral chronic ocular surface burns. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1000-10. Doi: 10.1016/j. ophtha.2015.12.042. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Gaddipati S, Muralidhar R, Sangwan V, Mariappan I, Vemuganti G, Balasubramanian D. Oral epithelial cells transplanted on to corneal surface tend to adapt to the ocular phenotype. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62(5):644-48. Doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.109517. [crossref][PubMed]
37.
Elhusseiny AM, Soleimani M, Eleiwa TK, ElSheikh RH, Frank CR, Naderan M, et al. Current and emerging therapies for limbal stem cell deficiency. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2022;11(3):259-68. Doi: 10.1093/stcltm/szab028. [crossref][PubMed]
38.
Mansoor H, Ong H, Riau A, Stanzel T, Mehta J, Yam G. Current trends and future perspective of mesenchymal stem cells and exosomes in corneal diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(12):2853. Doi: 10.3390/ijms20122853. [crossref][PubMed]
39.
Jiang TS, Cai L, Ji WY, Hui YN, Wang YS, Hu D, et al. Reconstruction of the corneal epithelium with induced marrow mesenchymal stem cells in rats. Mol Vis. 2010;16:1304-16. PMID: 20664793; PMCID: PMC2905634.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/62898.18498

Date of Submission: Mar 18, 2023
Date of Peer Review: May 10, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Aug 08, 2023
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? NA
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 22, 2023
• Manual Googling: May 20, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Aug 05, 2023 (11%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com